Can't wait for the 5-4 / 6-3 (KAGAN HATE TERRORISMISTS!) decision on this kind of thing not requiring a warrant.
thanks jonny
EDIT: Actually turns out the supreme court have already ruled this kind of thing is a search under the fourth amendment (thus requiring a warrant) from the comments:
The Supreme Court already ruled on this issue in KYLLO V. UNITED STATES. It ruled that “…the use of a thermal-imaging device aimed at a private home from a public street to detect relative amounts of heat within the home constitutes a “search” within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment.” The ruling details may other relevant and obvious reasons this technology is illegal.
Read the ruling here: http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/99-8508.ZO.html
Sadly, the agencies who invade our privacy will no doubt hide behind National Security to further erode what once made this nation free.
The commenter is of course right, this ruling will be ignored thanks to the War on Terror or what have you.
No comments:
Post a Comment